When a RADAR is being operated on the 1.5 mile range setting, what is the most appropriate pulse width and pulse repetition rate?

Get ready for the FCC General Radiotelephone Operator License (GROL) exam. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and detailed explanations. Prepare effectively for your licensing test!

Multiple Choice

When a RADAR is being operated on the 1.5 mile range setting, what is the most appropriate pulse width and pulse repetition rate?

Explanation:
For a close-range radar setting like 1.5 miles, you want the radar to distinguish targets that are fairly near each other, and you also want a reasonable update rate without causing range ambiguity. The pulse width determines range resolution: shorter pulses give finer resolution, while longer pulses smear targets together. A pulse width of 0.05 microseconds is extremely short, which yields a two-way range resolution of about 7.5 meters (roughly c × PW / 2 ≈ 3×10^8 m/s × 5×10^-8 s / 2). That’s ample to separate targets at 1.5 miles. The pulse repetition rate sets how far away you can unambiguously measure range (maximum unambiguous range) and how often you get updates. A PRF of 2,000 pulses per second gives a maximum unambiguous range of about 75 kilometers, so a 1.5-mile target is well within that limit, and you also get a good update rate for tracking. So, a very short pulse width with a PRF around 2 kHz provides the right balance of good range resolution for near targets and an unambiguous, timely display. That’s why the combination of 0.05 microseconds and 2,000 pps is the best choice.

For a close-range radar setting like 1.5 miles, you want the radar to distinguish targets that are fairly near each other, and you also want a reasonable update rate without causing range ambiguity. The pulse width determines range resolution: shorter pulses give finer resolution, while longer pulses smear targets together. A pulse width of 0.05 microseconds is extremely short, which yields a two-way range resolution of about 7.5 meters (roughly c × PW / 2 ≈ 3×10^8 m/s × 5×10^-8 s / 2). That’s ample to separate targets at 1.5 miles.

The pulse repetition rate sets how far away you can unambiguously measure range (maximum unambiguous range) and how often you get updates. A PRF of 2,000 pulses per second gives a maximum unambiguous range of about 75 kilometers, so a 1.5-mile target is well within that limit, and you also get a good update rate for tracking.

So, a very short pulse width with a PRF around 2 kHz provides the right balance of good range resolution for near targets and an unambiguous, timely display. That’s why the combination of 0.05 microseconds and 2,000 pps is the best choice.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy